UCTAA churchlight

Site Search via Google

Discussion 1 to A Miscellany 162
The "Chance v Design" debate

by: JT

To add to this exchange of views (or any other,) please use the Contact form.

Revisiting Misc 161 (thanks to the page-by-page conversion to the new site design,) I was once again reminded that not all those who consider themselves agnostics think like me.

I really don't understand how agnostics can even consider there is a debate on "Chance v Design." And to phrase the so-called debate in those terms shows a misunderstanding of evolution and a lack of comprehension of how long a billion years really is.

It's a real concern to me that the lies (and they are lies) presented by the Intelligent Design movement have convinced some people who call themselves agnostics to give serious consideration to this pseudo-science.